Ai IS HERE TO STAY

Artificial intelligence (Ai) is currently at the top of the technology heap. If you haven’t heard of it, then you are probably not reading this article, because I am using digital technology to publish this.

The trend is so strong that it is luring many entrepreneurs to find ways to monetize its use. Someone who failed English in high school is now promised to become an overnight sensation with a best-selling novel. People who go broke faster than they can cash their paycheck are being told they can amass great wealth with just a few keystrokes. Relationships can be restored through using Ai. On and on, name your problem and there is an Ai model to fix it.

Most of these, of course, come with a fee; but there are some that are keeping their basic Ai source free of charge. Two of these are both popular—ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude. Both of these also have paid tiers for power users.

Currently, though, it is not the power users who are on the radar of those concerned about Ai’s dark side. Counselors, teachers, parents, pastors, social workers, etc. are alarmed about the negative aspects of dependence on Ai by children and young adults.

I share some of these concerns, but not for the same reasons.

My idealism knows that if we were simply taught how to think rather than what to think, there would not be a problem. My realism checks my idealism to bring me down to the necessity of dealing with the potential problems among a citizenry that has lost its collective mind and now scrambles for the latest hot button in society. (I wrote about this earlier.)

As I ask questions among different groups, I find that there is ‘some’ concern, but no real direction as to how to approach what is happening. I’ve asked pastors, seasoned business leaders and teachers, but hand-wringing is about all I’ve come away with. Most don’t see any problem beyond the ability to plagiarize a term paper.

Our social scientists—professional and observers—see much more than that. Their concern is that personalities are being shaped, world-view is being compromised, and teen suicide is a real and prevalent danger.

I see the reports, the studies and the news articles and I agree. There is grave potential for much negative impact from the use of Ai. I want to sound a wake-up call to parents and grandparents, but I don’t have the platform or the voice. So, I do what I can do—I write.

In some ways, I think the danger has been overstated, but in other ways, I’m not so sure. We have worshiped at the media altar since before I was born. Newspapers, radio, television, telephone, internet, social media have all played a hand in our development for the current presentation of homo sapiens. In that place, what is there to fear? We’ve been living this reality for decades.

Can we back up and start over? What a ridiculous question!! Can we change where and what we are? A more thoughtful question. However, if I apply that question to society, then I come up with a strong sense of ‘NO!’ If I apply that question to myself, then ‘YES!’ is the only intelligent answer. And with that answer comes another thought-provoking question— ‘How?’

As a people, we have become so accustomed to quick and easy fixes, that any “fix” that requires time, discipline and work is almost immediately rejected.

SPOILER ALERT—that is how we got to where we are. Quick and easy is never a possibility for that which was formed over time without conscious awareness.

There is a ‘fix’ showing up which is more of a protection, but I am bothered by the implications. This is the development of specialized Ai programs or agents which limit exposure to that which is ‘unacceptable.’ “Unacceptable” in this case refers to that which would corrupt a Christian worldview.

Now, don’t jump to conclusions and get your panties in a wad over that. I am an avowed, dedicated and up-front Christian who believes what he learns from the Bible. I also know that there are more than 40k denominations in the world, many of whom espouse a different understanding of parts of Scripture from my own.

Therefore, the immediate question about the different Ai models to ‘protect’ Christians should be “according to whom?” and, “Does it matter?”

When it comes to the interpretation of the Bible, then YES, it matters. When it comes to protecting us from a corrupting worldview, then maybe not so much.

I am only familiar at this time with just two Ai models that fit this category of protection for Christians. One is specifically for a particular interpretation of the Bible and the other is for protection from corrupting ideas about the world.

I have used them both. Both of them require a monthly fee for their use. One offers a free trial. The other only offered a demonstration of its capabilities. In using each of them, I gave a prompt and then gave the same prompt to both ChaptGPT and Claude. What I learned was eye-opening in light of this discussion.

For the Scripture interpretation, I used—“What did Jesus mean in John 14:6?” I used that in both ChatGPT and Claude and in the one developed by a teacher of Universalism. Although each one was different, none were especially eye-opening or informing. They were not THAT different in their understanding. (I’ll tell you why in a moment.)

For the worldview interpretation, I used the very same prompt the Ai model used in its demonstration—“I’m jealous bout my neighbor’s new car. What should I do?” Interestingly, all three were in agreement. The “Christian” model responded as expected, and the other two were not categorically different.

As I considered a little more, I think I discovered the reason.

At first glance, it would appear that there should be no concern over the secular models leading us astray with a corrupt worldview. However, there is one little detail which might make all the difference—the two secular models already “knew” me.

Because I have been using ChatGPT and CLAUDE on a regular basis, they have both learned about me. Both are able to draw from previous chats. Since most of my work involves the Bible or my work as a pastor/teacher, both models referred to that aspect of my being when I used the “jealousy” prompt.

Therefore, this brings up the distinct possibility that Ai models will more than likely respond with that which you have already given them. If a teenager is continually feeding the model with thoughts of “I’m just a worm,” the model may respond accordingly. Have these kinds of tests been run yet?

Should we be concerned? Yes, for sure. Since we know that we have lost the ability for critical thinking, there is the distinct danger of being told what to think by a source with whom we would ordinarily disagree.

Should we be alarmed? Only if we know that we have failed to give those in our care sufficient tools to involve life head-on.

There is no quick fix to our current dilemma. We can only avail ourselves of the wisdom which dictates we prepare ourselves accordingly. We can bury our heads in the sand and hope it all works out for the good, or we can take deliberate steps to use Ai in an intelligent and moral way. The Ai you use can probably be “taught” to give you what you need.

Will confirmation bias be the next Ninja hiding within the Ai world?